I write this not to advocate for people immigrating to the United States or to campaign against them. This is a story about a desperate journey that tens of thousands are making, in spite of the cost or consequences. Because they feel they must. It is not about one person or group. I am using the stories of Venezuelans as an example because so many have fled their country and are coming to ours. In 2023, more than 260,000 Venezuelan migrants crossed the U.S.-Mexico border. Venezuela’s migrants represent the largest displacement crisis in the world.
The country’s precarious economy is heavily dependent on oil prices, which tend to be unstable. That coupled with Venezuela’s corrupt government has begotten an economic disaster compelling millions of its citizens to leave. The situation is so bad that some families are selling everything they own to raise enough money to get out.
It is not as if they’re fleeing without knowing the risks. The migrants have heard the horror stories of those who have traveled north: the robberies and assaults, the sexual violence against women, the walking, the endless walking. Think for a moment about how horrific life must be to consider abandoning everything and everyone you know and fleeing to another country, thousands of miles away, on foot. But also think about having no way to provide for your family in a country where a brutal authoritarian regime is routinely persecuting its citizens.
It is a 3,700-mile walk from Venezuela to the U.S.-Mexico border. The most dangerous section is the Darien Gap, a dense jungle straddling Colombia and Panama. The area is one of the rainiest places on Earth, where flash floods have carried people away in their sleep. Through this treacherous, muddy, and roadless expanse, the migrants must walk or be carried for some 60 miles with no place to buy food, treat wounds, or seek help.
If they survive the jungle — and, according to the Red Cross, many don’t — they still have 2,700 miles of walking, hitchhiking, or bus rides to go before reaching the border. The journey can take more than three months.
So imagine that after somehow enduring this three-month, 3,700-mile ordeal, they finally reach the U.S. border, where they encounter razor wire both in the water of the Rio Grande and spooled along the shoreline, courtesy of Texas Governor Greg Abbott. It stands to reason that anyone with the drive to survive that harrowing journey would not be persuaded to turn back because of a fence, even one made of the same material meant to keep inmates in prisons.
Last summer an account surfaced from a Texas trooper who was on patrol near Eagle Pass when he encountered a large group of migrants crossing the Rio Grande. According to The Texas Tribune, the trooper wrote in an email to his supervisor: “We called the shift officer in command, and we were given orders to push the people back into the water to go to Mexico. We decided that this was not the correct thing to do. With the very real potential of exhausted people drowning. We made contact with command again and expressed our concerns and we were given the order to tell them to go to Mexico.”
The trooper also reported a pregnant young woman suffered a miscarriage when she became caught in the razor wire. Many have reported cuts and gashes trying to get to the other side of it.
The Supreme Court has said the U.S. Border Patrol can cut the wire, but Abbott is ordering more wire be laid in defiance of the court.
The matter of what to do about immigration gnaws at deep emotions. Few United States citizens wish would-be immigrants ill will. But some (of various political inclinations) believe the country’s security is seriously threatened by the border crisis.
Whatever we feel about the situation, this much we do — or should — know:
Walls won’t stop these desperate humans. Neither will wire. The solution needs to be comprehensive immigration reform. And that is now off the table until after the presidential election in November. It is a humanitarian crisis that has become a political football; something to be kicked around, this way and that, for political advantage.
President Joe Biden is worried that the immigration issue could cost him reelection. And he should be. Donald Trump and Republicans think they can win on this issue. So Trump has told Republican legislators to stop working on a border compromise until, most likely, after the election. House Speaker Mike Johnson said the immigration bill worked on for months in the Senate is “absolutely dead.”
Regardless of how one feels about immigration and the well-being of our country, this is not good news.
The Steady newsletter is supported by the Steady community. Please consider subscribing if you aren’t already a member.
We are all immigrants. Imagine being turned away after a harrowing trip across the Atlantic. not being allowed to disembark a rickety sail ship after barely surviving storms and disease.
We are short thousands of houses nationwide. We are short of labor nationwide. Houses need to be built, by labor that does not at present exist nationally..
The median age for American farmers is 60 years, and a number of American farms lack sufficient labor to operate efficiently. In addition, there are questions about our emphasis on farming huge acreages, rather than smaller plots of land. The latter often use less water and fewer chemicals than do the larger US farms; and global warming and climate change are exacerbating current water and chemicals' use.
Our meat processing plants are often charged with using child immigrant labor. In the recent past Eggland , a major producer of eggs, has been raided for illegal use of immigrant labor. Tyson Foods has been questioned about use of immigrant labor.
Where is public outcry about these conditions? How is that the state of Texas can determine national immigration policy? Do corp[orations headquartered in Texas takr any intererst in these matters? If not, why not?